Dyno Run Today

[TGPilot]

The dip is a bad spot in my TPS. Senses 38% at 60%ish deflection from time to time. Just so happened twice in a row that day! :wink:

Literally only thing done to this chip is AZRC code with my 5-speed changes. Upped the boost to 12 psi with the MAP sense and stock WasteGate Actuator Solenoid. No fuel or timing changes. She is off the scale PIG rich from 2500RPM on up.

Finally got all needed for logging correctly and will be tweaking some to pass emmisions...but nothing else until my go fast parts get here.

Peace...Kenny 8)

[GangstGP]

Nice, getting real close to 400 ft-lbs @ the crank. 8)

There wasa guy like 3-4 years ago that hit 372 ft/lbs. on the dyno. Cant remember who it was now.

[mfewtrail]

Nice, getting real close to 400 ft-lbs @ the crank. 8)

There wasa guy like 3-4 years ago that hit 372 ft/lbs. on the dyno. Cant remember who it was now.

http://www.tgpforums.com/tgp/viewtopic.php?t=318&highlight=zach+dyno


Zach's dyno was not correct, his car was a stock chip car w/ a K&N and a modded catback exhaust(someone else on the board now owns his car). Assuming 20% drivetrain loss for the auto, that would equate to around 440 ft-lbs at the crank = no way with what that car had. I can see a chip/k&N/exhaust equipped auto TGP with a manual boost controller hitting 300 ft-lbs or a tad more on a dynojet considering what the 5spd cars with similar mods have put down.

[dbtk2]

Yeah, there is no way his dyno is correct.  He said he did it on a school dyno from a 5mph roll.  Nobody dynos from a 5mph roll and in our cars you would be in first gear.  Obviously they must've used more than 1st gear for the dyno so the high torque number was due to the shifting, or was due to the torque convertor locking up or something like that.

I'd like to see his dyno sheet because I bet you can tell what caused it by looking at the sheet for a minute.  

My STE on the other hand, put down 276lb.ft. to the wheels when it was basically completely stock.  (K&N & No cat)  However, this is significantly lower than what Zach claimed to have made.

Shawn

[mfewtrail]

.  

My STE on the other hand, put down 276lb.ft. to the wheels when it was basically completely stock.  (K&N & No cat)  However, this is significantly lower than what Zach claimed to have made.

Shawn

Was that 276 ft-lbs on the stock boost controller(unmodified)?

[dbtk2]

.  

My STE on the other hand, put down 276lb.ft. to the wheels when it was basically completely stock.  (K&N & No cat)  However, this is significantly lower than what Zach claimed to have made.

Shawn

Was that 276 ft-lbs on the stock boost controller(unmodified)?

It was with stock boost controller (stock boost ramp and all) and only 6psi boost due to a hole in the I/C inlet hose.  Removing the cat & installing the K&N did help the turbo spool much quicker though.

Shawn

[Berettaspeed]

Very nice numbers, TQ ownz.....lol